Approximate reading time: 3m 35s

Artificial Intelligence: Trust It or Not? The Real Story Behind the Algorithms

At the end of 2022, when ChatGPT appeared publicly and became the fastest-growing application in history (with 100 million users in just 2 months according to UBS Report, 2023), thousands of people began to wonder: „Can we trust artificial intelligence?“. From students looking for homework help to managers seeking marketing ideas – AI began to enter every area of our lives. But behind this convenient facade lies a fear: „What if it is wrong?“.

Call us! We offer useful and topic-specific AI simulations for corporate training.

In this article I will share real examples, give you concrete facts, and show you how to judge – when AI is a helpful assistant and when it is a dangerous illusion.

When AI creates something false – but convincing

In 2023, a lawyer in the United States used ChatGPT to prepare a court document. The AI provided him with court decisions that looked completely logical and had real citations. The problem? The cases did not exist. The AI had „made them up“. This led to a disciplinary review and a fine. (Source: The New York Times, 2023)

This case is not an exception. AI models like GPT, Claude, or Gemini can produce a completely realistic, logical, and grammatically correct answer – one that in fact has no connection to reality. This phenomenon is called „AI hallucination“, or more precisely – when the machine "makes things up" without knowing it is wrong.

Check out our online course AI Artificial Intelligence in Action – First Steps in the Workplace.  Within a few modules in our online training  you will learn the basics of generative AI, understand how artificial intelligence works, and start confidently using tools such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Google Gemini in your professional practice.

Fact: AI knows nothing. It only predicts.

This is a shock for many people: AI does not „know“ the answers. It does not „understand“ the content. Instead, it makes statistical predictions about which word should come next. This is based on billions of texts it has „read“ (more precisely: analyzed).

For example, if you enter „Sofia is the capital of...“, the probability that the next word will be „Bulgaria“ is very high. But if you start with false context, AI will follow it – even if it is completely wrong.

That is why AI should never be used as the sole source of truth, especially for:

• Medical advice

• Legal decisions

• Historical facts

• Financial forecasts

When is AI truly useful?

1. Idea generator

When you are in a creative block, AI can help you with:

• Article titles

• Campaign ideas

• Product names

• Scenarios, opening lines, and metaphors

Many copywriters use AI for an initial set of ideas, which they then edit. This saves time and expands creativity.

2. Automation of routine tasks

Artificial intelligence is excellent at tasks such as:

• Generating emails

• Document summaries

• Organizing information

• Voice recognition and transcription

Here there is little risk of „hallucinations“, because the tasks are mechanical and can easily be validated by a human.

3. Learning aid (with a caveat)

AI can be an excellent assistant for:

• Explaining terms

• Clarifying difficult concepts

• Creating sample tests

But it should not be relied on as a source of accurate facts, unless a specific source is provided (which most AI systems do not do by default).

How do we know whether AI's answer is correct?

Here are specific questions to ask yourself:

Is a source cited?
Is the source real (can the link be opened)?
Does the mentioned author, law, or event exist?
Can the same information be found in reputable sources (e.g., Britannica, World Health Organization, European institutions)?

Example: If AI claims that Article 54 of the „Electronic Services Act“ in Bulgaria exists – check lex.bg or the National Assembly website. If it does not exist – then it is a hallucination.

Data and research: How accurate is AI?

• According to a Stanford HAI study (2023), over 27% of ChatGPT-3.5 factual answers contain inaccuracies.

• For newer models (GPT-4, Claude 3), the percentage drops to 12–15%, but still 1 in every 8 answers may be inaccurate.

• In medicine, a JAMA (2023) study found that ChatGPT gives advice that aligns with medical standards in only 65% of cases.

This does not mean AI is "bad". It just means we need to know what it can, and what we should not expect from it.

Practical framework: When to use AI, and when not to?

AI does not replace the human brain. It complements it.

If AI is like a „smart child“, then we – humans – are the parents who must guide it. Set boundaries, check what it does, and take responsibility for the final result.

The real power of AI is not in asking it: „What is true?“, but in asking it:
„How can I think about this better?“

Sources used in the article:

• Stanford HAI, AI Index Report 2023: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/

• JAMA Network Open: Accuracy of ChatGPT in Providing Medical Information (2023): https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2804308

• New York Times: Lawyer Sanctioned for Using ChatGPT (2023): https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/22/nyregion/chatgpt-lawyer-fake-citations.html

• UBS Global Research: ChatGPT Growth Analysis (2023)

If this article was useful to you, share it with a colleague who is unsure whether to use AI.

This is not the future – this is the present.

We just need to use it with understanding, not blind trust.

Call us! We offer useful and topic-specific AI simulations for corporate training.